Legal Opinion

Pierce v. Haygood

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided September 6, 1957No. 19755; 19773; 19776PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Head, Justice.

1. Where the judge fails to certify that the “bill of exceptions is true,” this court is without jurisdiction to pass upon the merits of the exceptions. Code § 6-806, as amended, Ga. L. 1946, pp. 726, 732; Cady v. Cady, 161 Ga. 556 (131 S. E. 282); Blackley v. Bell, 187 Ga. 702 (1 S. E. 2d 676); Edge v. State, 199 Ga. 431 (34 S. E. 2d 498); Beasley v. Georgia Power Co., 207 Ga. 188 (60 S. E. 2d 363).

2. There can be no; second certificate to a bill of exceptions. Scott v. Central Railroad, 77 Ga. 450; Cordray v. Savannah Union Station Co., 134 Ga. 865 (68 S. E. 697); Langston v.…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Kniepkamp v. RichardsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1941
  2. Cordray v. Savannah Union Station Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1910
  3. Cady v. CadySupreme Court of Georgia · 1926
  4. Beasley v. Georgia Power Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1950
  5. Grant v. Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1916

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Walker v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1960
  2. Heisley v. Paymaster Checkwriter Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API