Legal Opinion

Rudy P. Avalos v. Andrew Saul

District Court, C.D. California

Decided August 12, 2021No. 5:20-cv-00986Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 RUDY P. A., Case No. CV 20-00986-RAO 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER 14 KILOLO KIJAKAZI,1 Acting Commissioner of Social 15 Security, Defendant. 16 17 18 I. INTRODUCTION 19 Plaintiff Rudy P. A.2 (“Plaintiff”) challenges the Commissioner’s denial of 20 his applications for disability insurance benefits (“DIB”) and supplemental security 21 income (“SSI”). For the reasons stated below, the decision of the Commissioner is 22 AFFIRMED. 23 24 25 1 Pursuant to Rule 25(d) of the Federal Rules of Civil…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Biestek v. BerryhillSupreme Court of the United States · 2019
  2. Bowen v. YuckertSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. Deborah L. Burch v. Jo Anne B. Barnhart, Commissioner of Social SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
  4. Smolen v. ChaterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
  5. Orn v. AstrueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API