Legal Opinion

Franklin v. Knowles

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided April 25, 2011No. 09-15551PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

Robert Duane Franklin’s petition for panel rehearing is granted. The memorandum disposition filed on January 10, 2011, is withdrawn. A new memorandum disposition will be filed concurrently with this order.

The court is in receipt of appellant’s pro se petition for rehearing en banc, dated January 24, 2011, and appellant’s pro se motion to take judicial notice, dated January 24, 2011. Because appellant is represented by counsel, only counsel may submit filings.

The Clerk shall serve copies of appellant’s pro se petition and pro se motion on appointed counsel of record, Walter K. Pyle.

In…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Estelle v. McGuireSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. Joseph Toussaint, Plaintiffs/appellees/cross-Appellants v. Daniel McCarthy Defendants/appellants/cross-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
  3. Benio Kalka v. Dan VasquezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
  4. Gollehon v. MahoneyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Franklin v. KnowlesSupreme Court of the United States · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API