Legal Opinion

Johnson v. Blell

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided January 29, 1895PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from the St. Louis City Circuit Court. — Hon. Daniel D. Fisheb, Judge. (1) The case was properly referred by the court of its own motion under the provisions of section 2138 of the Revised Statutes. Schmidt v. Bose, 6 Mo. App. *579; Martin v. Hall, 26 Mo. 386-389. (2) The deposition of defendant Blell was properly received in evidence as an admission by him against Ms interest.

Read the full summary

Appeal from the St. Louis City Circuit Court. — Hon. Daniel D. Fisheb, Judge. (1) The case was properly referred by the court of its own motion under the provisions of section 2138 of the Revised Statutes. Schmidt v. Bose, 6 Mo. App. *579; Martin v. Hall, 26 Mo. 386-389. (2) The deposition of defendant Blell was properly received in evidence as an admission by him against Ms interest. Kritser v. Smith, 21 Mo. 296; Priest v. Way, 87 Mo. 16; Bogie v. Nolan, 96 Mo. 85, 90. (3) The law presumes the truth of admissions o r declarations of parties against their interest; as to those in their favor,…

1Opinion of the CourtBiggs, J.

The plaintiffs are judgment creditors of the C. E. Blell Millinery Company, a business corporation. Their execution against the company having been returned unsatisfied, they instituted the present action, which is in the nature of a creditor’s bill, against the defendant, C. E. Blell.' The company was also made a party defendant. It is charged in the bill that Blell was the president and managing director of the corporation, and as such received the sum of $2,500, which represented a portion of the capital stock of the corporation, and which he had failed to account for, and that during his…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Henderson v. HendersonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1874
  2. Bogie v. NolanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1888
  3. Kritzer v. SmithSupreme Court of Missouri · 1855
  4. State v. CarlisleSupreme Court of Missouri · 1874
  5. Priest v. WaySupreme Court of Missouri · 1885

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Kenneth Investment Co. v. National BankMissouri Court of Appeals · 1902
  2. H. B. Cartwright & Bro. v. United States Bank & Trust Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1917
  3. Kopp v. MoffettMissouri Court of Appeals · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API