Legal Opinion
Cheltenham Township v. Pennsylvania Labor Relations Board
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
Decided March 31, 2004PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION BY
Judge PELLEGRINI.
Cheltenham Township (Township) 1 appeals an order of the Pennsylvania Labor Relations Board (Board) affirming a proposed decision and order issued by a Hear ing Examiner finding that the Township violated Act 111 2 as read with Section 6(l)(a) of the Pennsylvania Labor Relations Act (PLRA) 3 by failing to allow a police officer to have a private attorney, retained by the Cheltenham Township Police Association (Union), to act as his union representative during an investigatory interview.
The facts are as follows: Officer Robert Dougherty, Jr. (Dougherty), a 17-year…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Garrity v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- National Labor Relations Board v. J. Weingarten, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Philadelphia Fire Officers Ass'n v. Pennsylvania Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
- Houston Insulation Contractors Ass'n v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Upland Police Officers Ass'n v. City of UplandCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Town of Hudson v. Labor Relations CommissionMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2007