Legal Opinion
Mizzell v. Paul Revere Life Insurance
District Court, C.D. California
Decided July 20, 2000No. CV 98-6083-RAPPublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT IN PART
RICHARD A. PAEZ, Circuit Judge.
I
Introduction
Plaintiff Terry L. Mizzell (“Mizzell”) has filed this ERISA action against defendant The Paul Revere Life Insurance Company (“Paul Revere”) and others, seeking to recover long-term disability insurance benefits allegedly owed to him under a policy issued by defendant Paul Revere. 1 The Court previously granted defendant’s motion for partial summary judgment holding that the applicable standard of review of its denial of benefits to…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Rex T. KEARNEY, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. STANDARD INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- Goldie Miller, as of the Estate of Sarah M. Potok v. United Welfare FundCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
- Richard Atwood v. Newmont Gold Co., Inc., a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- Mary Anne Bendixen v. Standard Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Ehrensaft v. Dimension Works Incorporated Long Term Disability PlanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Alford v. DCH Foundation Group Long-Term Life Insurance of AmericaDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2001
- Ordway v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Co.District Court, S.D. California · 2007
- Sacks v. Standard InsuranceDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2009
- Siebert v. Standard Insurance Co. Group Long-Term Disability PolicyDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2002
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.