Legal Opinion

Chisholm v. Seattle Electric Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided January 8, 1902No. 4018PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Appeal from Superior Court, King County. — Hon, George Meade Emory, .Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Dunbar, J.

Action for damages for injuries alleged to have been received by appellant through being run over by a street car owned and operated by respondent.. At the close of plaintiffs testimony the defendant challenged the sufficiency of. the same and moved for judgment in its favor. The motion was sustained by the court, and this appeal involves the right of the court to sustain the motion, together with the alleged error of the court in striking out certain testimony.

The testimony, in brief, shows that defendant has two car tracks on Second avenue…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. McQuillan v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Traver v. Spokane Street Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1901
  3. Steele v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1899
  4. Burian v. Seattle Electric Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1901
  5. Mischke v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1901

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Pilmer v. Boise Traction Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1908
  2. Richardson v. Pacific Power & Light Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Richmond v. Tacoma Railway & Power Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1912
  4. Hynek v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1941
  5. Morris v. Seattle, Renton & Southern Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1912

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API