McLaughlin v. Wing
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
—Determination unanimously confirmed without costs and petition dismissed. Memorandum: Petitioner, who is over the age of 18, commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding challenging a determination made following a fair hearing denying her request for Medicaid reimbursement for root canal therapy *955on a rear molar. As a Medicaid recipient, petitioner is entitled to essential, not optimal, care. Recognizing that a reasonable alternative course of treatment would be extraction and replacement of the tooth, the Administrative Law Judge found that root canal therapy is not medically necessary. That…
2Cited by1 opinion
- Jarvis v. PullmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002