In re Thigpen
United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois
1Opinion of the Court
Section 1320b-17 allows but does not require SSA to withhold the maximum amount of current benefits under one Social Security program to recover a past overpayment under another Social Security program, even where the overpayment arose from the recipient's fraud. For that reason "SSA's withholding of Thigpen's OASDI benefits to recover its prior SSI overpayments is a setoff not a recoupment, and therefore that SSA's withholding is not exempt from the automatic stay." Thigpen , 590 B.R. at 818.
Setoff in Bankruptcy
The right of setoff is of equitable origin, designed to facilitate the adjustment…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- United Student Aid Funds, Inc. v. EspinosaSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
- Citizens Bank of Md. v. StrumpfSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- In Re: Hal, Inc. Hawaiian Airlines Inc. West Maui Airport, Inc. Debtors. Hal, Inc. Hawaiian Airlines Inc. West Maui Airport, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
- Allegaert v. PerotDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1978
- Faasoa v. Army & Air Force Exchange Service (In re Faasoa)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. California · 2017
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Royalty Properties, LLCUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 2019