Legal Opinion
Guillermo Nuno v. D. Eslick, J. Flores, and D. Satterfield
District Court, E.D. California
Decided September 15, 2025No. 1:21-cv-00769Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 GUILLERMO NUNO, No. 1:21-cv-00769-KES-SAB (PC) 12 Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING IN PART FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS; GRANTING 13 v. IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY 14 D. ESLICK, J. FLORES, and D. JUDGMENT; AND RECONSIDERING SATTERFIELD, PRIOR ORDER AND GRANTING 15 PLAINTIFF’S JULY 5, 2023 MOTION FOR Defendants. LEAVE TO FILE SECOND AMENDED 16 COMPLAINT 17 Docs. 68, 82, 114 18 19 Plaintiff Guillermo Nuno is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this action filed 20 pursuant to 42…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Christianson v. Colt Industries Operating Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Eminence Capital, Llc, and Jay Spechler v. Aspeon, Inc. Richard P. StackCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Christopher Owens Cynthia Hutchins,plaintiffs-Appellants v. Kaiser Foundation Health Plan,inc., a California Corporation,defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Lockheed Martin Corporation, Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant-Appellant v. Network Solutions, Inc., Defendant-Counter-Claimant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.