Legal Opinion

Kane v. Shephard

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 13, 1998PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

—Order insofar as appealed from unanimously reversed on the law with costs, motion denied and fourth cause of action reinstated. Memorandum: Supreme Court erred in granting that part of the motion of defendants Glenn V. Pitts and Katherine Pitts for summary judgment dismissing the fourth cause of action. “It is well established that a landowner is not liable for damages to abutting property for the flow of surface water resulting from improvements to his or her land so long as ‘the improvements are made in good faith to fit the property to some rational use to which it is adapted, and * * *…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Kossoff v. Rathgeb-Walsh, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1958
  2. Langdon v. Town of WebsterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  3. Osgood v. Bucking-ReddyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Hanley v. State of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API