Brooklyn Jenapo Federal Credit Union v. Schucher
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtL. Kingsley Smith, J.
Motion by the plaintiff to strike out the defendants’ answer and for summary judgment and cross motion by the defendants dismissing the plaintiff’s complaint and for summary judgment are in all respects denied.
This is a foreclosure action in which the defendants Sidney Schucher and Nettie Schucher executed a mortgage note and mortgage on July 28, 1960 to the plaintiff in order to secure the payment of a loan made by the plaintiff to one, Leo G-rabell. Upon default in payment by the borrower, Mr. Grabell, this action was instituted against the defendants. The answer interposed on their behalf…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- ROCKLAND-ATLAS NATIONAL BANK v. MurphyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1953
- Van Pelt v. P. and L. Federal Credit UnionCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1955
3Cited by4 opinions
- Knights of Columbus Federal Credit Union v. SalisburyConnecticut Appellate Court · 1985
- Alcoa Edgewater No. 1 Federal Credit Union v. CarrollSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1965
- McAnally v. Ideal Federal Credit UnionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1967
- Christian v. Atlanta Army Depot Federal Credit UnionCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1976