Legal Opinion

Murphy v. McGinnis

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 2, 1941No. Appeal, 113PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam,

This is a suit by the holder of a check against one of the indorsers. Various defenses were interposed, some of them raising questions of fact. The jury found a verdict for plaintiff. The court granted a new trial.

In the opinion of the court in banc, written by the trial judge, it is stated that he failed to charge the jury upon matters which were basic and fundamental and that he did not so instruct them as to clarify the issue and to enable them to comprehend the questions that they were to decide. He states “that fairness and justice dictate that a new tidal be had.” Plaintiff…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Weinfeld v. FunkSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1941

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Gerber v. Jones (Et Al.)Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
  2. Schornig v. SpeerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API