Murphy v. McGinnis
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam,
This is a suit by the holder of a check against one of the indorsers. Various defenses were interposed, some of them raising questions of fact. The jury found a verdict for plaintiff. The court granted a new trial.
In the opinion of the court in banc, written by the trial judge, it is stated that he failed to charge the jury upon matters which were basic and fundamental and that he did not so instruct them as to clarify the issue and to enable them to comprehend the questions that they were to decide. He states “that fairness and justice dictate that a new tidal be had.” Plaintiff…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Weinfeld v. FunkSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
3Cited by2 opinions
- Gerber v. Jones (Et Al.)Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
- Schornig v. SpeerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1942