Legal Opinion

Cartledge v. Seago

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided December 11, 1913PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Processioning. Before Judge Hammond. Richmond superior court. September 2, 1912.

1Opinion of the CourtHill, J.

Where processioners were appointed to trace and mark anew the lines around a certain tract of land, which they and the county surveyor proceeded to do, and upon trial of the issue made by a protest to their return the undisputed evidence of the county surveyor was, “What I intended to do was to locate these old lines under the old plat [made by a former surveyor]; I did not pay any attention to who was in possession of the respective tracts, nor anything of that kind; didn’t know anything about that. . . I don’t know if that old plat is correct;” and the undisputed evidence for the protestant…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Bowen v. JacksonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1897
  2. Boyce v. CookSupreme Court of Georgia · 1913
  3. Robson v. ShelnuttSupreme Court of Georgia · 1905

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Smith v. ClemonsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1944
  2. Aderhold v. LambertCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1942
  3. Langley v. WoodruffSupreme Court of Georgia · 1916
  4. Osborne v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1980
  5. Cartledge v. BrandonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1917

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API