Legal Opinion

City of Highwood v. Wightman

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided May 22, 1979No. 78-405PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. PRESIDING JUSTICE GUILD

delivered the opinion of the court:

This case is an aftermath of the case of Finish Line Express, Inc. v. City of Chicago (1978), 59 Ill. App. 3d 419, 375 N.E.2d 526, rev'd (1978), 72 Ill. 2d 131, 379 N.E.2d 290.

The defendant herein was charged with a violation of chapter 77— 0 — 11, section 3 — 11(10) of the Ordinances of the City of Highwood, which reads as follows:

“(a) A person commits gambling when he:(10) Knowingly transmits information as to wagers or betting odds, by telephone, telegraph, radio, semaphore or similar means; or knowingly installs or maintains…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Finish Line Express, Inc. v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Village of Maywood v. HoustonIllinois Supreme Court · 1956
  3. Village of Park Forest v. BraggIllinois Supreme Court · 1967
  4. Finish Line Express, Inc. v. City of ChicagoAppellate Court of Illinois · 1978

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Town of Normal v. BowskyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1986
  2. Town of Normal v. BowskyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API