Legal Opinion

Osburn v. State

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided October 27, 1966PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WOLCOTT, Chief Justice.

The prisoner seeks review of a sentence of 25 years for armed robbery. He plead guilty to the indictment; the sentencing judge ordered a presentence investigation and, subsequently, imposed the maximum sentence allowed by the statute, 11 Del.C. § 811.

This Court has no power on appeal to reduce a sentence which is within the maximum penalty allowed by the statute. Seeney v. State, Del., 211 A.2d 908; Cannon v. State, Del., 196 A.2d 399; Hinckle v. State, Del., 189 A.2d 432. The prisoner does not contest this rule, but seeks to have his sentence struck and his cause…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Green v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  2. Hinckle v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1963
  3. Seeney v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1965
  4. Cannon v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1963

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Siple v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1997
  2. Ward v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1989
  3. Jenkins v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2010
  4. Bailey v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1982
  5. Dabney v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2009

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API