Legal Opinion

Ives v. Culton

Texas Commission of Appeals

Decided March 30, 1921No. 162-3155PublishedCited by 17 opinions

Error to Court of Civil Appeals of Seventh Supreme Judicial District. Action by D. H. Culton against Edgar A. Ives. A judgment for plaintiff was affirmed by the Court of Civil Appeals (197 S. W. 619), and defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

McCLENDON, P. j.

This was an action in trespass to try title by D. H. Culton against Edgar A. Ives, to recover a half *322section of land in Swisher county. Defendant pleaded not guilty. A judgment of the trial court in favor of plaintiff was affirmed by the Court of Civil Appeals by a divided court. 197 S. W. 619.

The facts in the case are not disputed, and in so far as material to a decision are as follows:

The half section in controversy was the property of J. D. Raitt, who conveyed it to Ives „in'* September, 1915; but the deed was not recorded until June 13, 1916. In the meantime, on April 11,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Simmons v. ArnimTexas Supreme Court · 1920
  2. Ives v. CultonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1917
  3. Pope v. DavenportTexas Supreme Court · 1879

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Baker v. WestTexas Supreme Court · 1931
  2. Jones v. CaldwellCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1931
  3. Brinkman v. TinklerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1938
  4. Smith v. AllbrightCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1925
  5. Stewart v. Rockdale State BankCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1932

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API