Ott v. Stone.
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Action against respondent, W.P. Stone and one T.J. Stone, to recover balance due on a promissory note. The judgment in the trial was in favor of respondent W.P. Stone and against T.J. Stone for the amount due on the note.
The petition alleges that on December 28, 1917, respondent and T.J. Stone for value received executed their promissory note in the sum of $2447.99, due thirty days after demand, payable to the order of Phillip Ott, and bearing six per cent compound interest, payable semi-annually; that the sum of $1308.68 was paid on said note and credited thereon on February 27, 1919; that…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Hof v. St. Louis Transit Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1908
- Schmidt v. RozierMissouri Court of Appeals · 1906
- Miller v. HarperMissouri Court of Appeals · 1895
- Roy v. Kansas CityMissouri Court of Appeals · 1920
- Churchill v. LammersMissouri Court of Appeals · 1895
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Barr v. SnyderSupreme Court of Missouri · 1956
- Gannon v. BronstonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1932
- Wilkins v. SkoglundNebraska Supreme Court · 1934
- Swyers v. RussellMissouri Court of Appeals · 1968