Legal Opinion

United States v. Angelo Mele

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided June 15, 1972No. 213-216, 236, 779-783, Dockets 71-1579, 1619, 1620, 1685 and 1875PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. Justice CLARK:

Appellants Mele, Beltempo, Cuomo and Coniglio along with Arthur Madonia, now deceased, were convicted by a jury on charges of violations of the narcotics laws. On appeal we remanded for a hearing on a motion for new trial based on newly discovered evidence. It is now here on second appeal with the Government having confessed to the covert use of one of the defendants as an informer, the covert excision of relevant Jencks Act 1 material from records given the defense and the concealment of impeaching evidence against its chief witness. This conduct compels us to direct a new…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  2. Giglio v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Napue v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  4. Roviaro v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  5. United States v. James Vincent KeoghCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1968

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. United States v. Edmund RosnerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1973
  2. United States v. Elvin Lee BynumCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1973
  3. United States v. John F. GrismoreCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1976
  4. Johnson Kenneth Evans v. Theodore Janing, Sheriff of Douglas County, NebraskaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1973
  5. United States v. Charles CassinoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1973

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API