Legal Opinion

State v. Westeen

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided March 24, 1999No. 97-2019PublishedCited by 56 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TERNUS, Justice.

This case presents our first opportunity to interpret Iowa’s “crack-house” statute, Iowa Code section 124.402(l)(e) (1997). The primary issue presented is whether this statute requires a showing of some degree of continuity in order to establish that the defendant was “keeping” a dwelling for the purpose of possessing or selling controlled substances. We think it does and conclude that trial counsel rendered ineffective assistance in failing to raise this issue in the district court. Therefore, we reverse and remand.

I. Background Facts and Proceedings.

The defendant, Douglas…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. State v. SchoelermanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1982
  2. Osborn v. StateSupreme Court of Iowa · 1998
  3. State v. CroneSupreme Court of Iowa · 1996
  4. State v. AtleySupreme Court of Iowa · 1997
  5. State v. CeaserSupreme Court of Iowa · 1998

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by56 opinions

  1. Ledezma v. StateSupreme Court of Iowa · 2001
  2. State v. GravesSupreme Court of Iowa · 2003
  3. State v. DudleySupreme Court of Iowa · 2009
  4. State of Iowa v. Scottize Danyelle BrownSupreme Court of Iowa · 2019
  5. State v. PaceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1999

51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API