Legal Opinion

Lexington Supermarket, Inc. v. United States Department of Agriculture

District Court, S.D. Ohio

Decided June 1, 1999No. C-3-99-60PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION AND ENTRY CONDITIONALLY SUSTAINING THE MOTION OF DEFENDANT OHIO DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH TO DISMISS, PURSUANT TO FED.R.CIV.P. 12(B)(1) (DOC. #1); FURTHER PROCEDURES ORDERED OF DEFENDANT

RICE, Chief Judge.

On September 10,1997, Plaintiff Lexington Supermarket, Inc. (“Lexington”), entered into a relationship with the Ohio Department of Health as a retail vendor under the Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants and Children’s Program (‘WIC program”). 1 The WIC program is a federally-funded, but state implemented, program providing supplemental foods to women, infants, and…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. McNutt v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
  2. The Ohio National Life Insurance Company v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
  3. Plumbers & Steamfitters Joint Apprenticeship Committee v. Ohio Civil Rights CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1981
  4. James H. ROGERS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. STRATTON INDUSTRIES, INC., Fred S. Almy, and D.E. Stolberg, Defendants-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1986
  5. Katherine Amen v. City of Dearborn, a Municipal Corp.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1976

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Baltimore Ravens, Inc. v. Self-Insuring Employers Evaluation BoardOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Baltimore Ravens, Inc. v. Self-Insuring Emp. Evaluation Bd.Ohio Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Baltimore Ravens, Inc. v. Self-Insuring Employers Evaluation BoardOhio Supreme Court · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API