Legal Opinion · Concurrence

City of Virginia Beach v. Virginia Land Investment Ass'n No. 1

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided March 2, 1990No. Record 890780Published

1ConcurrenceJustice Lacy

Different standards for determining the validity of comprehensive zoning ordinances and piecemeal downzoning ordinances have been established in our prior opinions. In Board of Supervisors v. Carper, 200 Va. 653, 107 S.E.2d 390 (1959), we considered a single zoning ordinance which amended Fairfax County’s comprehensive zoning law. The ordinance applied to the entire western two-thirds of Fairfax County and required a minimum of two acres for residential home development. If the landowner aggrieved by the ordinance was to prevail, we required that he prove that the ordinance was “clearly…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. First English Evangelical Lutheran Church v. County of Los AngelesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  2. Board of Supervisors v. Snell Construction Corp.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1974
  3. Board of County Supervisors v. CarperSupreme Court of Virginia · 1959
  4. BOARD OF SUPER. OF FAIRFAX CTY. v. Snell Const. Corp.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1974
  5. Bartz v. Board of SupervisorsSupreme Court of Virginia · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API