Legal Opinion

Villar v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided December 14, 1983No. 82-2399PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BERANEK, Judge.

Appellant appeals his conviction of second degree murder on two grounds, both related to admissibility of evidence. We affirm. Evidence of a collateral crime was admissible in this case as it was relevant to negate appellant’s theory of self-defense. See Williams v. State, 110 So.2d 654 (Fla.1959). Furthermore, we find no error in the admission of appellant’s oral statements made at the detention center. Although his parents were notified that appellant had been arrested, they were not told of the interrogation. Notification under Section 39.03(3)(a), Florida Statutes (1981),…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Williams v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1959
  2. Doerr v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1980
  3. Batch v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Wuornos v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1994
  2. State v. CartwrightDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984
  3. McNamee v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2005
  4. State v. WoodsCircuit Court for the Judicial Circuits of Florida · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API