Legal Opinion

Barnett v. Ross

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 4, 1939No. Appeal, 290PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam,

The statement of claim in this case was clearly insufficient. The judgment of non pros, is affirmed on the opinion of President Judge Bok in the court below. ;

Judgment affirmed.

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Local No. 163, International Union of United Brewery, Flour, Cereal, Soft Drink & Distillery Workers v. WatkinsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
  2. Nagele v. Electronic Data Systems Corp.District Court, W.D. New York · 2000
  3. Alexander v. AlexanderSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1978
  4. Layman v. Jenkins, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Franklin County1951