Legal Opinion

Takamine v. Hirschfeld

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided May 9, 1927No. 11,821PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Adams

Hirschfeld, defendant in error and plaintiff below, sued Takamine on a contract and recovered judgment; first, before a justice of the peace and thereafter on appeal to the county court. Takamine, defendant, brings the case here for review and asks for a supersedeas.

The evidence shows that Takamine was the secretary and a stockholder and director of The Midwest Portland Cement Company, a Colorado corporation with a large authorized capitalization but no funds. Hirschfeld, a Denver printer, was engaged to print the stock certificates of the company, but the material was expensive and he…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Reed v. First National BankSupreme Court of Colorado · 1897
  2. Rogers v. First State BankSupreme Court of Colorado · 1926
  3. Moon v. GreenleeSupreme Court of Colorado · 1921
  4. Jones v. DunlapSupreme Court of Colorado · 1925
  5. Spelts v. AndersonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1919

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Most Worshipful Prince Hall Grand Lodge v. Most Worshipful Hiram Grand LodgeSupreme Court of Colorado · 1929
  2. Ady v. Weicker Transfer & Storage Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API