Takamine v. Hirschfeld
Supreme Court of Colorado
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Adams
Hirschfeld, defendant in error and plaintiff below, sued Takamine on a contract and recovered judgment; first, before a justice of the peace and thereafter on appeal to the county court. Takamine, defendant, brings the case here for review and asks for a supersedeas.
The evidence shows that Takamine was the secretary and a stockholder and director of The Midwest Portland Cement Company, a Colorado corporation with a large authorized capitalization but no funds. Hirschfeld, a Denver printer, was engaged to print the stock certificates of the company, but the material was expensive and he…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Reed v. First National BankSupreme Court of Colorado · 1897
- Rogers v. First State BankSupreme Court of Colorado · 1926
- Moon v. GreenleeSupreme Court of Colorado · 1921
- Jones v. DunlapSupreme Court of Colorado · 1925
- Spelts v. AndersonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1919
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Most Worshipful Prince Hall Grand Lodge v. Most Worshipful Hiram Grand LodgeSupreme Court of Colorado · 1929
- Ady v. Weicker Transfer & Storage Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1935