Legal Opinion

Bigler v. Mapleton Irrigation Canal Co.

Utah Supreme Court

Decided August 16, 1983No. 18256PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

HOWE, Justice:

Defendant Mapleton Irrigation Canal Company appeals from a judgment entered on a special jury verdict in favor of the plaintiffs, Dee Jay Bigler and Carol Bigler, his wife, for damages resulting from the flooding of their property on August 25, 1979.

The Canal Company is a non-profit corporation which delivers to plaintiffs’ property water of the Strawberry Canal which carries a maximum of 90 second feet of water and flows 12 months of the year. From that canal water is diverted into a lateral known as Fullmer Ditch through a head-gate under lock and exclusive control of the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Lamkin v. LynchUtah Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Erickson v. BennionUtah Supreme Court · 1972
  3. MacKay v. BreezeUtah Supreme Court · 1928
  4. Calahan v. WoodUtah Supreme Court · 1970
  5. Jordan v. Mount PleasantUtah Supreme Court · 1897

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Jensen v. Intermountain Power AgencyUtah Supreme Court · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API