Centennial Insurance v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance
Court of Special Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the Court
BLOOM, Judge.
This appeal presents a question not heretofore answered by the Court of Appeals or this Court: What effect may, or must, be given to conflicting “escape” or avoidance of coverage clauses in two liability insurance policies, each of which would provide coverage to the driver of a motor vehicle involved in a collision if no other policy provides coverage but would deny coverage if any other insurance were available?
The facts that give rise to this case are basically undisputed and singularly uncomplicated. Criswell Chevrolet, Inc., an automobile dealer, provided Robert Crampton…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Jennings v. Government Employees InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1985
- Travelers Indemnity Company v. ChappellMississippi Supreme Court · 1971
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, a Corporation v. Mid-Continent Casualty Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1975
- Celina Mutual Casualty Co. v. Citizens Casualty Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1950
- Bond v. Pennsylvania National Mutual Casualty InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1981
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Empire Fire and Marine Ins. Co. v. Liberty Mutual Ins. Co.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1997
- Universal Underwriters Insurance v. Allstate InsuranceCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1994
- United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. United States Fire InsuranceCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1992
- Harford Mutual Insurance Company v. Starstone National Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2026