Legal Opinion

Smith v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided December 14, 1925No. 4471PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McCAMANT, Circuit Judge.

A motion for a directed verdiet was overruled and an exception was reserved. The bill of exceptions does not purport to include all the testimony; on the contrary, it contains the following statement: “In addition to the testimony set out hereinabove, other testimony relevant to, and tending to prove, the guilt of each of the defendants with respect to each of the counts charged in the indictment, was introduced, received, and considered.” With the record in this condition, we cannot pass on the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain the conviction.

It is argued that…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. United States v. YuginovichSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
  2. United States v. StafoffSupreme Court of the United States · 1923

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Sorrentino v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1947
  2. Chevillard v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1946
  3. Du Vall v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1936
  4. Conway v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1944
  5. Anastasio Lawrence Amaya v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1957

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API