Legal Opinion · Dissent

Craig D. Sallie v. State of Mississippi

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided March 8, 2018No. 2015–CT–00819–SCTPublished

1Dissent

KING, JUSTICE, DISSENTING:

¶ 33. Because I disagree that the trial court had the authority to restructure Sallie's sentences for aggravated assault and possession of a weapon by a convicted felon, I respectfully dissent.

¶ 34. In Sallie's first appeal, the Court of Appeals affirmed his conviction, and this Court granted certiorari for the limited purpose of "address[ing] the issue of whether Sallie was entitled to notice of the firearm enhancement to his sentence." Sallie v. State , 155 So.3d 760 , 761 (Miss. 2015). Indeed, "we limit[ed] our review to the question of whether Sallie received…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Davis v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Leonard v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1973
  3. Sweat v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 2005
  4. Craig D. Sallie v. State of MississippiMississippi Supreme Court · 2015
  5. Ethridge v. StateCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 2001

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API