Legal Opinion

Ball v. Tatum

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided July 20, 2012No. 2011-CA-001716-MEPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

NICKELL, Judge:

Jessica Ball appeals from an order entered by the Daviess Circuit Court designating her adoptive parents, Henrietta and Fred Tatum, de facto custodians of E.N.K.,1 her special needs2 daughter. The court awarded Ball and the Tatums joint custody of the four-year-old child, who neither walks nor talks, and named the Tatums primary residential custodians. Ball maintains the Tatums did not qualify as de facto custodians because they had not been the child’s exclusive caregivers and financial supporters for one year as required by KRS3 403.270. Having reviewed the record, the…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. EnglishKentucky Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Moore v. AsenteKentucky Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Paramount Foods, Inc. v. BurkhardtKentucky Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Gateway Construction Company v. WallbaumCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1962
  5. Cherry v. CherryKentucky Supreme Court · 1982

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Joviniano Albino Santiago v. Teresa BerryCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2021
  2. Rachel Sizemore v. Virgil R. HuttonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2023
  3. Retherford v. MondayCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2016
  4. Scott W. Nelson v. Melissa L. JenningsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2020
  5. Sharon Kingcade v. Shelbie SherwoodCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API