Legal Opinion

Pearson v. Group Long Term Disability Plan for Employees of Tyco International (US), Inc.

District Court, E.D. Arkansas

Decided March 3, 2008No. 4:07CV00871 JLHPublished

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

J. LEON HOLMES, District Judge.

Robert Pearson commenced this action pursuant to section 502(a) of ERISA to recover longterm disability benefits allegedly due him under a plan sponsored by Tyco International (US), Inc., the parent company of his former employer. The administrative record has been filed, and both parties have submitted briefs, so this case is ripe for decision. For the reasons stated hereinafter, the Court remands Pearson’s claim for long-term disability benefits to Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company for a determination of eligibility.

I

Robert Pearson…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Sims v. ApfelSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  4. Beverly D. Woo v. Deluxe Corp., Hartford Life Insurance Co., Doing Business as Itt Hartford, Inc., Sued as Hartford Life Insurance Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1998
  5. Dan M.. Sandoval v. Aetna Life And Casualty Insurance Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1992

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API