United States v. George Sultani
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
1Per curiam
In a trial by a magistrate, defendant was found guilty of violating a traffic regulation applicable to Washington National Airport. He was not represented by counsel. His request for the appointment of counsel, supported by his assertion of indigency, was denied on the ground that it was unlikely that a jail sentence would be imposed in the event that defendant was found guilty. Upon finding him guilty, the magistrate sentenced the defendant to five days in jail with execution of the jail term suspended and with defendant placed on unsupervised probation for twelve months on condition that he…
2Cited by10 opinions
- United States v. Jose Ortega, Jesus MancinasCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996
- Celeste Broughton v. State of North Carolina John Baker Rufus EdmistenCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1983
- United States v. Gerald Dee FosterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Adkins v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1991
- United States v. Patrick M. ReilleyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.