Legal Opinion

In re Nutramax Cosamin Marketing & Sales Practices Litigation

United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation

Decided December 17, 2013No. MDL No. 2498PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TRANSFER ORDER

JOHN G. HEYBURN II, Chairman.

Before the Panel:* Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1407, common defendant Nutramax Laboratories, Inc. (Nutramax) moves to centralize this litigation in the Central District of California, or, in the alternative, the District of Maryland. The litigation consists of the three actions listed on Schedule A, which are pending in the Southern District of California, the Southern District of Florida, and the Northern District of Illinois, respectively. Rite Aid Corporation and Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., both of which are defendants in only the Southern District of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In Re BP P.L.C. Securities LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 2010
  2. In re Gerova Financial Group, Ltd., Securities LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 2011

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In re Natrol, Inc., Glucosamine/Chondroitin Marketing & Sales Practices LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 2014
  2. In re Health Management Associates, Inc. Qui Tam Litigation (No. II)United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 2014
  3. In re Pella Corp. Architect & Designer Series Windows Marketing, Sales Practices & Products Liability LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API