Legal Opinion

Epstratios Karayannis v. Herbert Brownell, Jr., Attorney General of the United States

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided June 6, 1957No. 15-1100PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

We stayed a deportation order pending appeal because the appeal presented at least one substantial question which would otherwise become moot.

*81A New York decree annulling the marriage of the appellant alien, and the statute quoted in Judge Prettyman's dissent, are the only basis of the deportation order. The statute authorizes deportation of an alien who is “found to have secured [his] visa through fraud, by contracting a marriage which” is afterwards retroactively annulled. The statute says nothing about securing a marriage through fraud. It mentions none of the various grounds on which…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. TBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1959
  2. Epstratios Karayannis v. Herbert Brownell, Jr., Attorney General of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1957
  3. Epstratios Karayannis v. Herbert Brownell, Jr., Attorney General of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1957
  4. Epstratios Karayannis v. Herbert Brownell, Jr., Attorney General of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1957
  5. Epstratios Karayannis v. Herbert Brownell, Jr., Attorney General of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API