Legal Opinion

Sternburg v. Bowman

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided November 15, 1869PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGray, J.

This case is too clear for argument. The jury have found that the notes sued on were made to the plaintiff to enable him to represent himself to other creditors of the defendants as having nearly twice as large a claim against the defendants as he really had, and thus obtain a proportionably larger dividend on his debt than the other creditors under the composition deed signed by all of them. The plaintiff, in taking the notes for this purpose, practised a fraud upon the other creditors. The consideration of the notes was therefore illegal, and the notes were wholly void as between the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Harvey v. VarneyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1867

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. McCausland v. RalstonNevada Supreme Court · 1877
  2. P. J. Willis & Bro. v. MorrisTexas Supreme Court · 1885
  3. Brown & Franklin v. Everett Ridley Ragan Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1900
  4. Fay v. FayMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1877
  5. McTighe v. McKeeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1902

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API