Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Marshall v. Sweeney

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided March 8, 1950No. 32121PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

By the Court.

The question presented is well stated in relator’s brief as follows:

“The single question presented is whether a declaration of candidacy and the petition consisting of a number of separate part-petitions, filed therewith, meet the requirements of law if such declaration of candidacy is filed and the statements made therein are sworn to by the candidate on only one of such separate petition papers, and such declaration of candidacy so filed is copied on each of the other separate petition papers before the signatures of electors are placed thereon. Stated otherwise, the question…

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. Zielasko v. OhioDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1988
  2. Zielasko v. State of OhioDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1988
  3. Lynn v. SuppleOhio Supreme Court · 1957
  4. State ex rel. Hanna v. MilburnOhio Supreme Court · 1959
  5. State ex rel. Higgins v. BrownOhio Supreme Court · 1960

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API