Legal Opinion

The PEOPLE v. Rose

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided April 1, 1971No. 43326PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Goldenhersh

Petitioners, Joseph Rose and Hugo Mattes, appeal from the judgment of the circuit court of Cook County denying their petition for relief filed under the provisions of the Post-Conviction Hearing Act. (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1969, ch. 38, 112—1 et seq.) Rule 651(a) provides for appeal directly to this court.

This is the second appeal in this case. (See People v. Rose, 43 Ill.2d 273.) After hearing the evidence as directed by our mandate the trial court again denied the petition and this appeal followed. The facts are reviewed at length in our earlier opinion and will be restated here only to the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. The PEOPLE v. RoseIllinois Supreme Court · 1969
  2. The People v. HarperIllinois Supreme Court · 1969
  3. The People v. AldenIllinois Supreme Court · 1959
  4. The People v. CaiseIllinois Supreme Court · 1967

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. People v. Del VecchioIllinois Supreme Court · 1989
  2. People Ex Rel. Daley v. FitzgeraldIllinois Supreme Court · 1988
  3. People v. BraceyIllinois Supreme Court · 1972
  4. People v. JohnsonIllinois Supreme Court · 2002
  5. People v. HallIllinois Supreme Court · 1993

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API