Legal Opinion

Schnackenberg v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided March 9, 1921No. 6523PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Appeal from District Court, Travis County; George Calhoun, Judge. Suit by the State of Texas and others against J. L. Schnackenberg and others. Erom judgment for plaintiffs, defendants appeal.

1Opinion of the Court

This suit was filed in Travis county on the 2d day of July, 1919, by the state of Texas, joined by John T. Smith, A. S. Newburg, and George W. Butler, against appellants to recover title to the following described tract of land, to wit:

"Patent to A. A. Durfee survey: 331 acres of land situated in Wichita county, on the waters of Red river, about 18 miles N. 30° W. from Wichita Falls, beginning at the N.E. corner of F. W. Huseman's survey and the S.W. corner of a survey of 1,280 acres for Lucinda Meadow thence N. 8° W. with W. line of said Meadow survey 1,309 vrs. a stake on bank of the river,…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Stafford v. KingTexas Supreme Court · 1867
  2. Maddox Bros. & Anderson v. FennerTexas Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Ayers v. WatsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  4. Boon v. HunterTexas Supreme Court · 1884
  5. Johnson v. ArchibaldTexas Supreme Court · 1890

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Oklahoma v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  2. Strayhorn v. JonesTexas Supreme Court · 1957
  3. Oklahoma v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  4. State v. Atlantic Oil Producing Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1937
  5. Smith v. TurnerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1928

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API