Legal Opinion

Sease v. Central Greyhound Lines, Inc.

New York Court of Appeals

Decided February 25, 1954PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtVan Voorhis, J.

This appeal involves a motion to vacate the service of a summons. Defendant is a domestic corporation, but has been served in the manner provided by section 52 of the Vehicle and Traffic Law for service upon a foreign corporation. The motion to vacate the service of the summons has been denied upon the ground that defendant is estopped to deny that it is an Ohio corporation.

*286The statement to plaintiff’s attorney by the assistant manager of defendant’s Binghamton office is insufficient on which to found an estoppel. He stated, according to plaintiff’s lawyer, that defendant’s name and address…

2Cited by12 opinions

  1. Gould Electronics Inc., F/k/a Gould Inc. American Premier Underwriters, Inc. v. United States of America Gould Electronics Inc. American Premier Underwriters, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
  2. Brandes Meat Corp. v. CromerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
  3. Gould Electronics Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
  4. State v. TustinMissouri Court of Appeals · 1959
  5. Corning v. Lehigh Valley RailroadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1961

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API