Legal Opinion

Bullock v. Saul

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided August 8, 2023No. Civil Action No. 2020-1764Published

1Opinion of the Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA PAUL BULLOCK, Plaintiff, v. No. 20-cv-1764-ZMF KILOLO KIJAKAZI, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION Plaintiff Paul Bullock (“Mr. Bullock”) moves for reversal of Defendant Commissioner of the Social Security Administration’s (“SSA” or “Commissioner”) decision adopting the findings of an Administrative Law Judge (“ALJ”) in denying Mr. Bullock’s application for Supplemental Security Income. See Pl.’s Mot. J. Reversal (“Pl.’s Mot.”), ECF No. 18. The Commissioner moves for affirmance. See Def.’s Mot. J.…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Winschel v. Commissioner of Social SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2011
  3. Bonnilyn Mascio v. Carolyn ColvinCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2015
  4. Joyce A. Rutherford v. Jo Anne B. Barnhart, Commissioner of the Social Security AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2005
  5. McIntyre v. ColvinCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2014

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API