Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Berkley Assurance Company v. Melissa Willis, as parent/guardian of MacY Lee Willis

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided September 29, 2021No. 2020-CA-0354Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in part

BERKLEY ASSURANCE * NO. 2020-CA-0354 COMPANY * COURT OF APPEAL VERSUS * FOURTH CIRCUIT MELISSA WILLIS, AS PARENT/GUARDIAN OF * STATE OF LOUISIANA MACY LEE WILLIS, ET AL. * * ******* CONSOLIDATED WITH: CONSOLIDATED WITH: BERKLEY ASSURANCE NO. 2020-CA-0355 COMPANY VERSUS MELISSA WILLIS, AS PARENT/GUARDIAN OF MACY LEE WILLIS, ET AL. LOBRANO, J., CONCURS IN PART, DISSENTS IN PART, AND ASSIGNS JCL REASONS. I respectfully concur in part and dissent in part. I concur with the majority’s conclusion that Berkley stated a cause of action in concursus. I also agree with the majority’s reversal of…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Duncan v. USAA Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 2007
  3. Forbes v. CockerhamSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2009
  4. Matter of Recovery I, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1994
  5. Gingles v. DardenneSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2009

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API