Legal Opinion

Mackenzie v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of United States

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided June 25, 1931PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Per curiam

The policy does not contemplate payment of benefits to the assured for temporary disability. The clause providing that “ total disability shall be presumed to be permanent when it is present and has existed continuously for not less than three months ” was clearly intended to extend to the assured the benefits of the policy when doubt existed as to whether the disability was permanent. The plaintiff’s admission that he had recovered from his disability at the time he presented his claim is, therefore, fatal to his cause of action.

Judgment affirmed, with twenty-five dollars costs.

All concur;…

2Cited by8 opinions

  1. Pearlman v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
  2. Richards v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Grenon v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1932
  4. Triplett v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United StatesWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1936
  5. Graham v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of United StatesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1936

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API