Legal Opinion
McMains v. Cunningham
Supreme Court of Iowa
Decided November 18, 1930No. 40568PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtFaville, J.
One Ray Cunningham was made a defendant in this action as the holder of a chattel mortgage upon the automobile in question. The decree was adverse to the claim of said Ray Cunningham under said chattel mortgage. It does not appear that he has joined in the appeal of said cause to this court and appellee’s motion to dismiss the appeal as to said Ray Cunningham is sustained. We shall refer to the defendants Ira Cunningham and Susie Cunningham as the appellants, and McMains as the sole appellee.
The pleadings cover 140 pages of the abstract to present the issues in the case.
On September 19, 1929,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- In re TuneDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 1902
- In re ForbesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1911
- In re DurhamDistrict Court, E.D. Arkansas · 1900
- Peoples National Bank v. MaxsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1915
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Orville William Harris and Gladys Maxine Harris, Bankrupts v. Harry HoffmanCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1967
- Bracewell v. HughesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1931
- Moffitt v. Denniston & Partridge Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1940