Legal Opinion

Smith v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided February 9, 2004No. A03A1804PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SMITH, Chief Judge.

In this pro se appeal, Robert Frank Smith challenges the trial court’s denial of his demand for a speedy trial. We find that the trial court did not fully and completely address the merits of Smith’s demand because the court did not consider it under the federal constitution. We therefore remand this case with direction for the court to do so.

This case has a somewhat tortuous procedural history. On October 28, 2001, Smith was arrested based on three criminal warrants charging him with terroristic threats and acts, aggravated assault, and criminal trespass. At the time of…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Haisman v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1979
  2. Andrews v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1985
  3. State v. BazemoreCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2001
  4. State v. CarltonSupreme Court of Georgia · 2003
  5. Roberson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1997

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Nusser v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2005
  2. Henderson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2008
  3. Eagles v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2004
  4. State v. MooreCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2007
  5. Smith v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2006

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API