Brendle v. . Herren
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Motion heard before Montgomery, Judge, at Pall Term, 1887, of PIaywood Superior Court. In the progress of this cause, and after a response from the jury to an issue submitted to them, it was adjudged by the Court as follows: 1. That the defendant A. L. ELerren had a charge and lien upon the land sued for, for the sum of $300, with interest on the same from the 12th day of October, 1870, and that he hold said land until the same is satisfied and paid; 2. That upon the payment…
Read the full summary
Motion heard before Montgomery, Judge, at Pall Term, 1887, of PIaywood Superior Court. In the progress of this cause, and after a response from the jury to an issue submitted to them, it was adjudged by the Court as follows: 1. That the defendant A. L. ELerren had a charge and lien upon the land sued for, for the sum of $300, with interest on the same from the 12th day of October, 1870, and that he hold said land until the same is satisfied and paid; 2. That upon the payment of said sum, with interest, as above provided, the said defendant A. L. Herren is hereby declared a trustee for the…
1Opinion of the Court
Smith, C. J.,
(after stating the case). No specific errors are pointed out, and we are at a loss to know of what the appellant complains. The judgment, perhaps unnecessary to be reviewed in terms, is in strict conformity to that previously rendered, and which, on account of differences between them as to the form of the deed required, remains unperformed. We have not that prepared by the plaintiff before us, and cannot pass upon its sufficiency. But in examining the other, we think its provisions conform in substance to the requirements of the order, and should be accepted by the plaintiff,…
2Cited by1 opinion
- Brendle v. . HerrenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1887