Willamette Graystone, Inc. v. Hammond

Employer seeks review of an order of the Employment Appeals Board (EAB) awarding unemployment compensation benefits to claimant. We review EAB’s legal conclusions for errors of law, ORS 183.482(8)(a). Also, employer argues that EAB erred in finding that employer failed to carry its burden of proof that claimant was guilty of work-related misconduct. We review that finding for substantial evidence, ORS 183.482(8)(c); Asplundh Tree Expert Co. v. Hart, 132 Or App 494, 497, 888 P2d 1092 (1995). We affirm.

EAB found that claimant worked for employer as a delivery truck driver, first through a…