Legal Opinion

National Grange Mutual Insurance v. Mutual Benefit Insurance

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided February 9, 2010No. 09-2501Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CHAGARES, Circuit Judge.

National Grange Mutual Insurance Company (“National Grange”) filed a declaratory judgement action concerning insurance coverage for a motor vehicle accident, and Mutual Benefit Insurance Company (“Mutual”) filed a counterclaim for declaratory judgment. Both insurers filed cross-motions for summary judgment pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 56. requesting judgment in their favor on their respective complaints. The District Court granted summary judgment in favor of National Grange and denied Mutual’s cross-motion. For the reasons set forth below, this Court will affirm.

I

Be…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Lawrence v. City of Philadelphia, Pa.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008
  2. Emerson Radio Corp. v. Orion Sales, Inc. Otake Trading Co. Ltd. Technos Development Limited Shigemasa Otake John Richard BondCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2001
  3. Arnold M. Diamond, Inc. v. Gulf Coast Trailing Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1999
  4. Cicconi Auto Body v. Nationwide InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API