Legal Opinion

Pale Horse Designs, Inc. v. Stanfab Apparels

Massachusetts Superior Court

Decided August 21, 2007No. 065391PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Fabricant, Judith, J.

*164INTRODUCTION

This action arises from a set of commercial transactions involving an effort by the plaintiff Pale Horse Designs, Inc., to purchase clothing manufactured by the defendant Stanfab Apparels in India. Defendant Natarajan Rathnam advanced money for payment for the goods, taking in return a note from Pale Horse, guaranteed by the individual plaintiff, Karen Chansky, the principal of Pale Horse. Pale Horse did not pay the loan, and Rathnam threatened collection. The plaintiffs brought this action, naming Rathnam along with Stanfab and an associated entity, Twelve…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  2. Product Promotions, Inc. v. Jacques Y. CousteauCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
  3. Tatro v. Manor Care, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1994
  4. Good Hope Industries, Inc. v. Ryder Scott Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1979
  5. Linkage Corp. v. Trustees of Boston UniversityMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1997

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. American Paper Recycling, Inc. v. Renew Bahamas, Ltd.Massachusetts Superior Court · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API