Legal Opinion

Thompson v. Saunders

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 30, 2008PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

The defendant made a prima facie showing that the plaintiff did not sustain a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d) as a result of the subject accident (see Toure v Avis Rent A Car Sys., 98 NY2d 345 [2002]), shifting the burden to the plaintiff to produce sufficient evidence to raise a triable issue of fact.

In opposition, the plaintiff failed to raise a triable issue of fact. The plaintiff failed to produce competent medical evidence of restrictions in range of motion roughly contemporaneous with the subject accident (see LaFerlita v Seagull 2000, Inc., 54 AD3d 905…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Toure v. Avis Rent a Car Systems, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 2002
  2. Kearse v. New York City Transit AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
  3. Ayzen v. MelendezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
  4. Zarate v. McDonaldAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
  5. LaFerlita v. Seagull 2000, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Sutton v. YenerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API