Legal Opinion

People v. Huff

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided February 18, 1913No. Docket No. 114PublishedCited by 17 opinions

Exceptions before sentence from the superior court of Grand Rapids; Stuart, J. Anna Huff was convicted of larceny.

1Opinion of the CourtStone, J.

The respondent in this case was charged jointly with her daughter, Feronia Huff, with the larceny of a clock of the value of $1, in a store in the daytime. The evidence on the part of the people tended to show that the parties were detected, while in the act of the larceny, by a detective. The respondent was immediately arrested, and the clock, claimed to have been stolen, together with some other articles, was found in her possession. The respondent denied her guilt, but upon a separate trial was convicted, and the case is before us upon exceptions before sentence.

There are numerous…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. White v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1895
  2. State v. MerrimanSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1891
  3. People v. LairdMichigan Supreme Court · 1894
  4. Spurr v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1898
  5. People v. LyonsMichigan Supreme Court · 1882

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. People v. WhalenMichigan Supreme Court · 1973
  2. People v. PantagesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
  3. People v. DorrikasMichigan Supreme Court · 1958
  4. People v. HillMichigan Supreme Court · 1932
  5. People v. ConaMichigan Supreme Court · 1914

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API